Skip to content

Fix flake in RabbitMQ DSM snapshots across bucket boundaries - #8972

Draft
bouwkast wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
steven/dsm-flak-4
Draft

Fix flake in RabbitMQ DSM snapshots across bucket boundaries#8972
bouwkast wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
steven/dsm-flak-4

Conversation

@bouwkast

@bouwkast bouwkast commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary of changes

Since the DSM stats are aggregated in 10 second buckes the same pathway can appear more than once, so this goes and groups them and then grabs the first only.

Reason for change

Flaked here https://dev.azure.com/datadoghq/a51c4863-3eb4-4c5d-878a-58b41a049e4e/_build/results?buildId=206016&view=logs&j=0cad3504-1a92-5a43-34ae-f4023f981687&t=0b455496-9860-5768-a99e-6f5c6c3cdcbd

and the cause was that the snapshots changed.

Implementation details

Test coverage

Same

Other details

#incident-57303

@bouwkast

bouwkast commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the area:tests unit tests, integration tests label Jul 31, 2026
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray!

Reviewed commit: 4d5e3f4bc8

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8972) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration71.83 ± (71.79 - 72.13) ms74.55 ± (74.39 - 74.88) ms+3.8%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration80.27 ± (80.46 - 81.58) ms76.94 ± (76.74 - 77.26) ms-4.1%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1094.89 ± (1093.39 - 1099.55) ms1092.45 ± (1089.39 - 1096.91) ms-0.2%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.40 ± (22.35 - 22.45) ms22.27 ± (22.23 - 22.32) ms-0.6%✅
process.time_to_main_ms84.76 ± (84.47 - 85.06) ms83.27 ± (82.97 - 83.57) ms-1.8%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.03 ± (11.03 - 11.04) MB11.00 ± (11.00 - 11.00) MB-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.33 ± (22.29 - 22.37) ms22.04 ± (22.02 - 22.06) ms-1.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms85.28 ± (85.01 - 85.56) ms82.54 ± (82.39 - 82.70) ms-3.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.06 ± (11.06 - 11.07) MB11.04 ± (11.03 - 11.04) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms210.28 ± (209.34 - 211.21) ms211.03 ± (210.13 - 211.92) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms538.93 ± (537.63 - 540.23) ms538.53 ± (537.23 - 539.83) ms-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.64 ± (49.60 - 49.67) MB49.52 ± (49.49 - 49.56) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.25 ± (21.20 - 21.30) ms20.81 ± (20.78 - 20.84) ms-2.1%✅
process.time_to_main_ms74.78 ± (74.49 - 75.07) ms71.11 ± (70.97 - 71.24) ms-4.9%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.72 ± (10.72 - 10.73) MB10.70 ± (10.70 - 10.71) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms20.82 ± (20.79 - 20.86) ms20.76 ± (20.72 - 20.79) ms-0.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms72.52 ± (72.35 - 72.69) ms71.75 ± (71.62 - 71.87) ms-1.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.83 ± (10.83 - 10.84) MB10.83 ± (10.83 - 10.84) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms371.98 ± (369.86 - 374.09) ms371.29 ± (369.07 - 373.51) ms-0.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms546.78 ± (545.59 - 547.96) ms544.35 ± (543.27 - 545.44) ms-0.4%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.65 ± (50.63 - 50.68) MB50.62 ± (50.60 - 50.64) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.21 ± (19.17 - 19.25) ms19.41 ± (19.37 - 19.45) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms71.47 ± (71.20 - 71.74) ms73.74 ± (73.50 - 73.98) ms+3.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.76 ± (7.76 - 7.76) MB7.76 ± (7.76 - 7.77) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.44 ± (19.40 - 19.49) ms19.12 ± (19.10 - 19.15) ms-1.6%✅
process.time_to_main_ms74.88 ± (74.62 - 75.13) ms72.55 ± (72.33 - 72.76) ms-3.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.83 ± (7.82 - 7.84) MB7.82 ± (7.81 - 7.82) MB-0.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms296.66 ± (294.51 - 298.81) ms296.20 ± (294.20 - 298.19) ms-0.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms492.46 ± (491.49 - 493.44) ms496.20 ± (494.99 - 497.41) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed38.07 ± (38.04 - 38.10) MB38.07 ± (38.05 - 38.09) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)-0.6%✅

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration210.98 ± (210.61 - 211.56) ms210.94 ± (210.64 - 211.69) ms-0.0%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration214.99 ± (214.44 - 215.34) ms214.57 ± (214.31 - 215.12) ms-0.2%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1265.27 ± (1264.17 - 1271.43) ms1260.15 ± (1261.63 - 1269.12) ms-0.4%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms203.57 ± (203.12 - 204.02) ms202.70 ± (202.22 - 203.18) ms-0.4%✅
process.time_to_main_ms89.89 ± (89.58 - 90.20) ms89.28 ± (88.98 - 89.58) ms-0.7%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.07 ± (16.05 - 16.09) MB16.17 ± (16.15 - 16.19) MB+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.2%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms202.98 ± (202.52 - 203.44) ms201.86 ± (201.44 - 202.28) ms-0.6%✅
process.time_to_main_ms91.51 ± (91.27 - 91.76) ms90.62 ± (90.36 - 90.88) ms-1.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.08 ± (16.06 - 16.09) MB16.20 ± (16.18 - 16.22) MB+0.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (21 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms401.33 ± (399.93 - 402.73) ms397.88 ± (396.44 - 399.33) ms-0.9%✅
process.time_to_main_ms566.20 ± (565.03 - 567.37) ms565.94 ± (564.61 - 567.27) ms-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed59.80 ± (59.70 - 59.91) MB59.63 ± (59.46 - 59.80) MB-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.1%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms208.47 ± (208.06 - 208.87) ms207.07 ± (206.64 - 207.51) ms-0.7%✅
process.time_to_main_ms78.92 ± (78.61 - 79.23) ms78.11 ± (77.85 - 78.38) ms-1.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.46 ± (16.44 - 16.48) MB16.49 ± (16.48 - 16.51) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (19 - 20)19 ± (19 - 20)-0.1%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms207.40 ± (206.88 - 207.93) ms206.83 ± (206.42 - 207.25) ms-0.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms79.58 ± (79.36 - 79.80) ms79.69 ± (79.43 - 79.95) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.48 ± (16.46 - 16.50) MB16.48 ± (16.45 - 16.50) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (20 - 21)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.8%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms579.91 ± (577.66 - 582.17) ms583.00 ± (580.79 - 585.20) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms579.70 ± (578.49 - 580.91) ms577.68 ± (576.46 - 578.89) ms-0.3%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.61 ± (61.53 - 61.69) MB61.59 ± (61.52 - 61.67) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)+0.2%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms209.30 ± (208.84 - 209.75) ms206.24 ± (205.83 - 206.65) ms-1.5%✅
process.time_to_main_ms78.75 ± (78.48 - 79.01) ms77.49 ± (77.21 - 77.77) ms-1.6%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.78 ± (11.76 - 11.80) MB11.78 ± (11.75 - 11.80) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)-0.9%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms209.21 ± (208.71 - 209.70) ms205.42 ± (205.02 - 205.81) ms-1.8%✅
process.time_to_main_ms80.08 ± (79.86 - 80.29) ms78.43 ± (78.24 - 78.62) ms-2.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.83 ± (11.81 - 11.85) MB11.84 ± (11.82 - 11.87) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.1%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms517.32 ± (511.82 - 522.81) ms509.77 ± (506.24 - 513.31) ms-1.5%✅
process.time_to_main_ms531.98 ± (531.07 - 532.89) ms525.61 ± (524.75 - 526.46) ms-1.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed51.36 ± (51.31 - 51.41) MB51.43 ± (51.39 - 51.47) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.2%✅
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8972) - mean (75ms)  : 71, 78
    master - mean (72ms)  : 69, 75

    section Bailout
    This PR (8972) - mean (77ms)  : 73, 81
    master - mean (81ms)  : 73, 89

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8972) - mean (1,093ms)  : 1038, 1148
    master - mean (1,096ms)  : 1052, 1141
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8972) - mean (112ms)  : 106, 119
    master - mean (115ms)  : 108, 121

    section Bailout
    This PR (8972) - mean (111ms)  : 108, 113
    master - mean (115ms)  : 108, 122

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8972) - mean (786ms)  : 760, 811
    master - mean (785ms)  : 763, 807
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8972) - mean (97ms)  : 95, 100
    master - mean (103ms)  : 97, 109

    section Bailout
    This PR (8972) - mean (98ms)  : 96, 100
    master - mean (99ms)  : 96, 103

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8972) - mean (943ms)  : 901, 985
    master - mean (950ms)  : 901, 999
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8972) - mean (101ms)  : 95, 106
    master - mean (98ms)  : 92, 105

    section Bailout
    This PR (8972) - mean (99ms)  : 94, 104
    master - mean (102ms)  : 96, 108

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8972) - mean (821ms)  : 786, 855
    master - mean (822ms)  : 782, 862
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8972) - mean (211ms)  : 205, 217
    master - mean (211ms)  : 205, 217

    section Bailout
    This PR (8972) - mean (215ms)  : 211, 219
    master - mean (215ms)  : 211, 219

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8972) - mean (1,265ms)  : 1212, 1319
    master - mean (1,268ms)  : 1214, 1321
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8972) - mean (303ms)  : 294, 312
    master - mean (303ms)  : 294, 312

    section Bailout
    This PR (8972) - mean (303ms)  : 297, 308
    master - mean (305ms)  : 295, 315

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8972) - mean (1,005ms)  : 980, 1031
    master - mean (1,009ms)  : 984, 1035
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8972) - mean (295ms)  : 289, 302
    master - mean (298ms)  : 291, 305

    section Bailout
    This PR (8972) - mean (296ms)  : 290, 303
    master - mean (297ms)  : 291, 303

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8972) - mean (1,201ms)  : 1159, 1243
    master - mean (1,200ms)  : 1160, 1239
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8972) - mean (294ms)  : 287, 301
    master - mean (300ms)  : 294, 306

    section Bailout
    This PR (8972) - mean (294ms)  : 289, 299
    master - mean (301ms)  : 293, 308

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8972) - mean (1,072ms)  : 1008, 1136
    master - mean (1,094ms)  : 989, 1199
Loading

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-07-31 20:28:47

Comparing candidate commit 4d5e3f4 in PR branch steven/dsm-flak-4 with baseline commit 1dbaad3 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 71 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 65 known flaky benchmarks, 61 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark.ExecuteNonQuery net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-28478.090op/s; -23959.122op/s] or [-8.021%; -6.748%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-7942.177op/s; -7480.983op/s] or [-9.417%; -8.870%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-9485.171op/s; -8304.028op/s] or [-9.644%; -8.443%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+306.621ms; +312.201ms] or [+152.156%; +154.925%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-50.981op/s; -46.046op/s] or [-9.172%; -8.285%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+383.248ms; +385.145ms] or [+302.789%; +304.288%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+90.640op/s; +96.524op/s] or [+11.951%; +12.726%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+391.347ms; +396.527ms] or [+346.327%; +350.911%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.693KB; +4.694KB] or [+98.806%; +98.821%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-60552.885op/s; -60055.971op/s] or [-47.113%; -46.727%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.816KB; +3.816KB] or [+80.699%; +80.711%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.169ms; -11.870ms] or [-7.551%; -5.544%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-60334.016op/s; -57550.690op/s] or [-44.040%; -42.009%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.544KB; +4.544KB] or [+98.261%; +98.274%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-48928.568op/s; -46684.555op/s] or [-44.237%; -42.208%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.315KB; +1.315KB] or [+106.388%; +106.404%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-268453.014op/s; -264849.318op/s] or [-27.410%; -27.042%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+479 bytes; +480 bytes] or [+39.212%; +39.221%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-28.380ms; -14.482ms] or [-12.656%; -6.458%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-89498.520op/s; -50735.422op/s] or [-9.561%; -5.420%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.280KB; +1.280KB] or [+105.947%; +105.963%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-157447.021op/s; -141471.296op/s] or [-22.622%; -20.327%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.378KB; +3.378KB] or [+89.003%; +89.017%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-72879.724op/s; -72111.202op/s] or [-49.047%; -48.530%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.336KB; +3.336KB] or [+88.150%; +88.161%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-73733.193op/s; -70851.297op/s] or [-46.915%; -45.082%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.264KB; +3.264KB] or [+88.493%; +88.506%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-55725.836op/s; -53104.776op/s] or [-44.393%; -42.305%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+219528.912op/s; +256795.009op/s] or [+7.320%; +8.563%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-18.963ms; -14.632ms] or [-8.741%; -6.745%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.759KB; -13.756KB] or [-42.324%; -42.316%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.285ms; +301.182ms] or [+150.042%; +150.490%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1013.542op/s; +1029.345op/s] or [+11.194%; +11.369%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.956ms; +302.208ms] or [+150.764%; +152.404%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2290.679op/s; +2503.865op/s] or [+17.520%; +19.151%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.641ms; +303.128ms] or [+151.440%; +152.692%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1859.246op/s; +1994.226op/s] or [+17.950%; +19.253%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.955ms; +297.938ms] or [+145.852%; +146.335%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+558.235op/s; +583.612op/s] or [+14.799%; +15.472%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.114ms; +301.529ms] or [+146.226%; +147.406%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2723.248op/s; +2766.371op/s] or [+39.564%; +40.190%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.398ms; +302.585ms] or [+150.638%; +151.231%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1369.012op/s; +1404.305op/s] or [+27.174%; +27.874%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-144.539µs; -140.601µs] or [-29.676%; -28.867%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+837.322op/s; +863.132op/s] or [+40.781%; +42.038%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-137.019µs; -110.067µs] or [-31.425%; -25.244%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+838.482op/s; +966.299op/s] or [+36.454%; +42.011%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-142.661µs; -120.695µs] or [-30.566%; -25.859%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+777.472op/s; +859.702op/s] or [+35.890%; +39.686%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-126.287µs; -121.753µs] or [-34.096%; -32.873%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1333.322op/s; +1388.623op/s] or [+49.380%; +51.428%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-103.605µs; -80.013µs] or [-33.076%; -25.544%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1208.519op/s; +1410.169op/s] or [+37.673%; +43.959%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-136.488µs; -114.064µs] or [-37.338%; -31.203%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1307.227op/s; +1445.799op/s] or [+46.911%; +51.884%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.503ms; +300.274ms] or [+149.483%; +149.868%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+332.128ms; +396.898ms] or [+360.871%; +431.246%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+662.707op/s; +825.569op/s] or [+5.446%; +6.784%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+367.099ms; +372.501ms] or [+278.735%; +282.837%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+361.436ms; +421.474ms] or [+166.185%; +193.789%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-584.931op/s; -538.188op/s] or [-53.001%; -48.765%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+205.501ms; +338.807ms] or [+87.576%; +144.385%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-675.978op/s; -592.152op/s] or [-45.088%; -39.497%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+340.145ms; +349.982ms] or [+203.446%; +209.330%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-404.778op/s; -367.189op/s] or [-28.184%; -25.567%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-173.992µs; -127.253µs] or [-8.814%; -6.446%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+36.745op/s; +48.919op/s] or [+7.254%; +9.657%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.945ms; +303.297ms] or [+152.054%; +152.735%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.514ms; +302.615ms] or [+150.588%; +151.641%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.875ms; +304.195ms] or [+151.147%; +152.815%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.992ms; +302.424ms] or [+151.148%; +151.867%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.052ms; +299.565ms] or [+147.374%; +148.121%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.190ms; +306.802ms] or [+153.163%; +155.501%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.949ms; +304.607ms] or [+151.551%; +152.885%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.724ms; +302.294ms] or [+148.887%; +150.666%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+36115.822op/s; +44087.994op/s] or [+7.171%; +8.754%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.379ms; +305.081ms] or [+149.934%; +151.775%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.605ms; -12.951ms] or [-7.722%; -6.022%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+19127.545op/s; +26049.525op/s] or [+5.247%; +7.146%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+15.821µs; +60.122µs] or [+3.908%; +14.851%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-23.975KB; -23.953KB] or [-8.745%; -8.737%]
  • unstable execution_time [-39.995µs; +18.506µs] or [-7.905%; +3.658%]
  • unstable throughput [-59.694op/s; +146.954op/s] or [-2.979%; +7.333%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-28.115KB; -28.097KB] or [-10.249%; -10.243%]
  • unstable execution_time [-55.570µs; +7.761µs] or [-9.630%; +1.345%]
  • unstable throughput [-7.873op/s; +172.357op/s] or [-0.450%; +9.847%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+6.579µs; +11.164µs] or [+15.550%; +26.388%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-4974.930op/s; -3100.821op/s] or [-20.943%; -13.053%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-12.394µs; -4.084µs] or [-19.229%; -6.336%]
  • unstable throughput [+962.395op/s; +2725.890op/s] or [+5.905%; +16.724%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.518ms; +302.954ms] or [+152.404%; +153.130%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.325ms; +304.689ms] or [+153.883%; +155.086%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.978ms; +302.029ms] or [+149.675%; +151.203%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+30583.647op/s; +33321.676op/s] or [+5.789%; +6.307%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.890ms; +302.112ms] or [+149.468%; +150.576%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.971ms; +302.232ms] or [+151.133%; +151.766%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.287ms; +306.534ms] or [+153.808%; +155.454%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.702ms; +300.952ms] or [+149.493%; +150.117%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+65979766.280op/s; +66429256.907op/s] or [+48.051%; +48.378%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+338.875ms; +396.679ms] or [+421.451%; +493.341%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.485ms; +300.535ms] or [+149.376%; +149.900%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+17701623.464op/s; +18671684.983op/s] or [+7.841%; +8.270%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+84182.290op/s; +95258.976op/s] or [+7.860%; +8.894%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+88474.373op/s; +118737.410op/s] or [+6.848%; +9.190%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+79362.410op/s; +86471.154op/s] or [+7.882%; +8.588%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+46935.724op/s; +54024.089op/s] or [+8.523%; +9.810%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+49373.524op/s; +68333.200op/s] or [+5.516%; +7.635%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area:tests unit tests, integration tests

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@bouwkast